Hard Lock Out Mechanics
I have run into issues where the chat agent that is engaged for editing a storybible or outline element targets instead changing chapters without a clear UI/UX indication of what was being edited or why.
In the specific case where this was the biggest problem, the agent had been told to resolve a contradiction in its characterization of a storybible/outline element, and instead of fixing that, it rewrote the prose in the chapter that was correct to conform to its incorrect characterization. The changes didn’t appear in the obvious places, so I had to go through the chapters to locate where the changes had been made. The changes were marked in purple, but this does not allow for differentiation of the those changes from other purple text that is in process from previous unrelated edits.
When I set an agent to working on the outline of a single chapter, the agent should not be able to abitrarily decide to start editing the manuscript of unrelated chapters or established storybible elements.
I can see the value in that being a feature that can be enabled, but in general, the agents need to be more focused because any non-trivial writing project will be too much context for them to meaningfully use without dilution or significant operational confusions.
I am aware of the “sudowrite can’t see this” toggles on some of the storybible elements, but this is more basic than that. I should be able to fix the exact context that the agent is allowed to edit, and the agent should not have the ability to override that. Certainly not silently.
Log in to comment and vote
Comments2
Ian Mclean
Jul 3
I have thought about it some more, and I think that it would be really nice to be able to narrowly scope the agents to individual elements such that we can control strictly what it is that the agent sees and is working on. This would allow us to scope to a single character or worldbuilding element and describe or talk about possible changes across however many entries the scope contains.
Grampsville
Jun 22
I put in a bug report on this last week. They said they are working on it. We will see. I believe it has to do with the fact that there is always a manuscript chapter selected, even if you are working on a bible element. This appears to confuse it.
The response I go to the error indicated that this made sense and they were actively looking into it…. so, now we wait. If I am right… and they fix it, this should eliminate a lot of the goofiness.